Nevada Silver Corporation Receives All Necessary Approvals for Drilling at The Corcoran Silver-gold Project, Nevada, USA

July 21, 2021

NOT FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES OR THROUGH U.S. NEWS WIRES

Toronto, Ontario, 21st July 2021: Nevada Silver Corporation (“NSC” or the “Company”) (TSXV: NSC) is pleased to announce that it has received all necessary approvals for the upcoming drill program at its 100% owned Corcoran Silver-Gold Project (“Corcoran” or the “Project”) located 22 kilometers east of Kinross’s Round Mountain Gold Mine in Nye County, Nevada, USA.

The Company has contracted Pinion Exploration & Construction Inc. (Battle Mountain, NV) to upgrade access and prepare drill sites for 29 drill pads, and drilling contractor Falcon Drilling Inc. (Carson City, NV) has mobilized a rig to Nevada, with drilling scheduled to commenced next month.

Corcoran includes the Silver Reef near-surface epithermal silver-gold deposit which is a NE-trending mineralized zone 300 meters wide and 1 kilometer long at Silver Reef Hill near the centre of the Project. The Silver Reef deposit (Tables 1.1 and 1.2) is open laterally and at depth and NSC plans to test the mineralization within the area of previous drilling as well as peripheral to the deposit, including a 12 square kilometer zone of prospective rock alteration containing areas of anomalous precious metals.

Drill Program

Eight HQ-sized diamond core verification drill holes (approximate total 1200 meters) are intended to confirm strongly mineralized drill intersections reported by other companies at Silver Reef and will form the first stage of the program. Historical reported drill intersections to be tested in the initial drilling program include:

  • CC02 (1.5m @ 3,531g/t Ag) as well as (1.5m @ 4,114g/t Ag and 0.27g/t Au)
  • CC30 (42.7m @ 390g/t Ag and 0.34g/t Au) as well as (4.6m @ 521g/t Ag and 0.45g/t Au)
  • CC38 (6.1m @ 1,874g/t Ag and 2.57g/t Au)
  • CCD04 (7.6m @ 1,150g/t Ag and 1.99g/t Au)
  • CCD09 (1.5m @ 4,103g/t Ag and 4.08g/t Au)
  • CCD15 (23.1m @ 39g/t Ag and 2.15g/t Au) as well as (1.8m of 1,186g/t Ag and 0.89g/t Au)
  • CCD21 (14.9m @ 268g/t Ag and 0.38g/t Au)

An immediate follow-on program of approximately 20 HQ holes (total 2,000-3,000 meters) will test for extensions to the Silver Reef mineralization both below and marginal to the area where an inferred mineral resource calculation was established (see below details of the inferred mineral resource calculation) and will also provide considerable in-fill data. This drilling is expected to extend the area of known mineralization and will form both the basis for an updated NI 43-101-compliant resource estimate as well as material for metallurgy and mineralogy studies. Additional drill holes may also be undertaken for groundwater, geotechnical and processing investigations.

Qualified Person

The scientific and technical data contained in this news release was reviewed and approved by Ian James Pringle PhD, who is a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.

For further Information please contact:

Gary Lewis
Group CEO, Director
T: +1 (416) 941 8900
gl@nevadasilvercorp.com

About Nevada Silver Corporation

Nevada Silver Corporation (TSXV:NSC) is a US-based, multi-commodity resource company with two advanced stage exploration projects in the USA (Corcoran Silver-Gold Project and Emily Manganese Project).

NSC’s principal asset is the Corcoran Silver-Gold Project in Nevada which was the subject of a National Instrument 43-101 compliant mineral resource estimate undertaken on the Silver Reef Zone by G. Mosher and D. Smith (see the technical report filed by NSC on www.sedar.com titled “Technical Report - Corcoran Canyon Silver-Gold Property” dated October 12, 2020). All resources (Table 1.1 and 1.2) were classified as Inferred because of the lack of available quality assurance – quality control (QA/QC) data. Resources were divided into pit-constrained and underground portions. The pit-constrained resource was stated at a silver-equivalent cutoff grade of 20 g/t and the underground resource at a silver-equivalent cutoff grade of 100 g/t. Mineral resources were stated in terms of silver equivalency, AgEq which combines capped silver and gold composite grades. A three-year trailing average price of US$17.00/ounce was used for silver and US$1,460/ounce for gold.

Table 1.1 Silver Reef Zone Pit-Constrained Inferred Mineral Resource Tabulation (Mosher & Smith, 2020)

Cutoff AgEq
g/t
Tonnes AgEq
g/t
Ag Capped
g/t
Au Capped
g/t
AgEq
Oz
100 306,000 119 87 0.42 1,168,000
75 1,326,000 92 63 0.39 3,939,000
50 6,139,000 67 41 0.34 13,155,000
40 11,091,000 57 34 0.3 20,227,000
30 14,695,000 52 30 0.29 24,566,000
20 31,482,000 39 21 0.23 39,030,000
10 44,952,000 32 17 0.2 45,550,000

Table 1.2 Silver Reef Zone Underground Inferred Mineral Resource Tabulation (Mosher & Smith, 2020)

Cutoff AgEq
g/t
Tonnes AgEq
g/t
Ag Capped
g/t
Au Capped
g/t
AgEq
Oz
100 175,000 122 102 0.26 702,000
75 703,000 92 73 0.25 2,110,000
50 1,080,000 81 63 0.23 2,889,000
40 1,445,000 71 54 0.23 3,460,000
30 1,958,000 62 47 0.21 4,628,000
20 4,636,000 41 27 0.19 6,658,000
10 10,688,000 26 15 0.15 9,953,000
  1. Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
  2. There is no certainty that all or any part of the Mineral Resources estimated will be converted into Mineral Reserves.
  3. AgEq = [((Capped Ag grade) * (Silver price/ounce/31.10348)) + ((Capped Au grade) * (Gold price /ounce / 31.10348))] / (Silver price / ounce/31.10348).
  4. Open-pit resources stated at a cut-off grade of 20 g/t AgEq; underground resources stated at a cut-off grade of 100 g/t AgEq.
  5. Assay grades were capped at 300 g/t silver and 2.5 g/t gold; capped silver and gold grades were used in the resource estimate.
  6. Mineral Resource tonnage and contained metal were rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may not add due to rounding.
  7. Mineral Resource tonnage and grades reported as undiluted.
  8. The effective date of this resource estimate is October 12, 2018

In addition, EML also owns the Emily Manganese Project (Minnesota) which has been the subject of considerable technical studies with US$23 million invested to date. Both Corcoran and Emily are wholly (100%) owned by NSC.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Forward-Looking Information

This news release contains “forward-looking information” and “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “forward-looking information”) within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Forward-looking information is generally identifiable by use of the words “believes,” “may,” “plans,” “will,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “could”, “estimates”, “expects”, “forecasts”, “projects” and similar expressions, and the negative of such expressions.

Forward-looking information is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company’s actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information, including, without limitation, risks as a result of the Company having a limited operating history and may have a wide variance from actual results, risks concerning the ability to raise additional equity or debt capital to continue its business, uncertainty regarding the inclusion of inferred mineral resources in the mineral resource estimate which are too speculative geologically to be classified as mineral reserves, uncertainty regarding the ability to convert any part of the mineral resource into mineral reserves, uncertainty involving resource estimates and the ability to extract those resources economically, or at all, uncertainty involving exploration (including drilling) programs and the Company’s ability to expand and upgrade existing resource estimates, risks involved in any future regulatory processes and actions, risks from making a production decision (if any) without any feasibility study completed on the Company’s properties, risks applicable to mining exploration, development and/or operations generally, and risk as a result of the Company being subject to certain covenants with respect to its activities by creditors, as well as other risks.

Forward-looking information is based on the reasonable assumptions, estimates, analysis and opinions of management made in light of its experience and perception of trends, current conditions and expected developments, and other factors that management believes are relevant and reasonable in the circumstances at the date such statements are made. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such information. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information.

All forward-looking information herein is qualified in its entirety by this cautionary statement, and the Company disclaims any obligation to revise or update any such forward-looking information or to publicly announce the result of any revisions to any of the forward-looking information contained herein to reflect future results, events or developments, except as required by law.